Dust Control is constantly the earliest to expire as counties slash operating cost

January 29th, 2010

As scores of cities are trying to outlive the central bank induced economic calamity, services for those communities are on the chopping block.  Often times we assume the services that our monies deliver, and whether or not you understand it, all those income taxes that you give are not going to these services. Those taxes take off to the secret banks that own the Federal Reserve central bank. The taxes that are used to preserve our state, region or city, are derived from taxes that we pay while going about our daily lives.

An illustration could be the gas tax added to every gallon of gas we buy. That capital is employed to maintain the roads. When citizens travel less, the profits from gas taxes begin to fall off radically. At some stage we start to have diminishing income. Such is the case when the powers that be resolve that Soil Stabilization on our roads will have to be cut. Poor roads – less driving – less driving – less gas tax

The moment we seize a dollar from a resident that’s valuable and waste it on a non productive event, that dollar is finished forever. If we use that dollar for a productive event the money stays in the system to provide more taxes into the system yet again.

Now let’s return to the road dust issue. If the town managers in charge of making these decisions could try to find a dust control product that might actually save funds instead of just moving from a actual dust control product to valuable water, the long side of the equation could bring more to the bottom line of the balance sheet. All too often, well intentioned people will make decisions based on supplementary data. It’s not inevitably their mistake but it is their duty to prevail over this failure to calculate.

With regards to dust control in addition to the cost of operations, if a bureaucrat deems it overly costly to make an application of a quality dust control product, they might fall back on the more customary yet less effective techniques of controlling dust. The first of these being the deployment of water for keeping the dusty dirt wet. This process while less pricey for the first treatment, requires multiple applications opposed to the one or two applications of the Dust Suppression product.

As soon as you put in the labor, fuel, time, equipment and other correlated costs to deploying a water truck, you immediately understand that the water truck operations will~ in the end cost more opposed to. the application of a first-class product. So when your well intentioned representative begins hacking at his annual plan, rather than funding the driving school for the blind, for the reason that its politically correct, try giving him a lecture in road dust management and how to conserve costs.

Share News World Report:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Tags: News Articles


Latest News Videos

Loading...